Systematic ReviewLeading journalMagnesiumHigh evidence score

Part 1: Executive Summary

Read full paper →
Authors
Robert W. Neumar, Michael Shuster, Clifton W. Callaway, Lana M. Gent, Dianne L. Atkins, Farhan Bhanji, Steven C. Brooks, Allan R. de Caen, Michael W. Donnino, Jose Maria E. Ferrer, Monica E. Kleinman, Steven L. Kronick, Eric J. Lavonas, Mark S. Link, Mary E. Mancini, Laurie J. Morrison, Robert E. O’Connor, Ricardo A. Samson, Steven M. Schexnayder, Eunice M. Singletary, Elizabeth Sinz, Andrew H. Travers, Myra H. Wyckoff, Mary Fran Hazinski
Journal
Circulation
Year
2015
Citations
710

Abstract

The process used to generate the 2015 AHA Guidelines Update for CPR and ECC was significantly different from the process used in prior releases of the Guidelines, and marks the planned transition from a 5-year cycle of evidence review to a continuous evidence evaluation process. The AHA continues to partner with the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) in the evidence review process. However, for 2015, ILCOR prioritized topics for systematic review based on clinical significance and availability of new

Test it on yourself

Run a structured magnesium experiment

The research gives you a prior. Your own data tells you what actually works for you.

Part 1: Executive Summary | Steady Practice | SteadyPractice