StudyTop journalRecoveryModerate

Home-based versus centre-based cardiac rehabilitation

Read full paper →
Authors
Lindsey Anderson, Georgina A Sharp, Rebecca J Norton, Hasnain Dalal, Sarah G Dean, Kate Jolly, Aynsley Cowie, Anna Zawada, Rod S Taylor
Journal
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Year
2017
Citations
319

Abstract

We included six new studies (624 participants) for this update, which now includes a total of 23 trials that randomised a total of 2890 participants undergoing cardiac rehabilitation. Participants had an acute myocardial infarction, revascularisation or heart failure. A number of studies provided insufficient detail to enable assessment of potential risk of bias, in particular, details of generation and concealment of random allocation sequencing and blinding of outcome assessment were poorly reported.

Test it on yourself

Run a structured recovery experiment

The research gives you a prior. Your own data tells you what actually works for you.

Home-based versus centre-based cardiac rehabilitation | Steady Practice | SteadyPractice